Ahmedabad CWG 2030 – Lessons from Delhi CWG 2010 and Global Standards for Mega Sporting Events

[Author: Archit Vyas, Advocate]

More than just a sporting achievement, Ahmedabad’s bid to host the 2030 Commonwealth Games is a statement of intent about how India wants to be perceived by the world in 2030 and beyond. The stakes are as high as the occasion. Despite delivering innovative urban infrastructure, the 2010 Commonwealth Games in Delhi were a moment of pride that became multifaceted due to poor governance, overspending, and underutilization of resources. Ahmedabad has the potential to establish a new standard for hosting mega-events in the Global South if it takes Delhi’s mistakes to heart and emulates its plans on international best practices.

This article sketches a clear, standards-based roadmap based on ISO 20121, IOC-OECD guidance, and sustainability frameworks adopted by Paris 2024 and London 2012. It also maps the hands-on lessons learned from CWG 2010 to the context of Ahmedabad.

Delhi 2010: Pride, Problems, and Practical Lessons

Delhi 2010 was inconsistent. Through insufficient oversight, inflated budgets, and legacy gaps, it dented public trust while delivering successful competition schedules and upgrades to city systems such as the Metro. These are timeless lessons for Ahmedabad, not merely historical tales.

Clarity of governance: Delhi’s Organizing Committee was criticized for its contractual work, monitoring, and procurement practices. These risks can be directly avoided by Ahmedabad’s decision to establish a Section 8 not-for-profit special purpose vehicle with independent audits, transparent procurement, and a sunset clause to dissolve after the Games. However, this decision must become practice rather than just policy. Open contracting, quarterly disclosures, and public dashboards must be non-negotiable.
Cost control: Delhi’s expenses increased dramatically as a result of dubious contracting and late design modifications. For high-risk packages, Ahmedabad must employ value engineering, lock early designs, and use open-book contracting. Estimates, contingencies, and significant change orders should be verified by a cost assurance panel that is separate from the organizing committee.
Infrastructure legacy: Delhi constructed excellent venues, but many found it difficult to maintain funding and community use after the Games. In order to maintain facilities’ viability and activity, Ahmedabad should plan venues for dual use from the start; elite competition and year-round community access; supported by multi-tenant operating models (schools, clubs, federations, and private events).
Operational readiness: Delhi saw test event gaps and last-minute fixes, which drive costs and erode confidence. Ahmedabad should commit to a structured pre-games event calendar across venues, stress-testing transport, security, medical services, and digital platforms well ahead of time.
Inclusive urban planning: Delhi’s metro expansion was a clear success, but short-notice “beautification” projects raised concerns around displacement and accessibility. Ahmedabad’s investments should be integrated with everyday mobility, disability access, and neighbourhood amenities, ensuring residents benefit long after athletes depart.

Comparative breakdown: Delhi 2010 vs Ahmedabad 2030 vs International standards

Dimension	Delhi 2010 (Past)	Ahmedabad 2030 (Planned)	Global standards (Best practice)
Governance	Allegations of bribery, weak oversight	Section 8 not-for-profit company, autonomous audits, sunset clause	IOC-OECD guidelines: transparency, hazard management, accountability
Infrastructure use	Sites underutilized post-Games	Multi-sport enclave, university-linked facilities, public access	ISO 20121: design for heritage, avoid “white elephants”
Urban planning	Metro expansion success; dislocation fears	Integrated city development, smart transport, comprehensive planning	UNESCO/UN guidance: align with development goals, lessen displacement
Sustainability	Inadequate focus, high resource intensity	Renewable energy, waste reduction, green transport	Paris 2024 model: carbon budgeting, circular economy, reliable offsets
Community legacy	Frail integration and programming	Community sports zones, repurposed athlete villages	IOC legacy guidelines: measurable long-term social benefits
Digital innovation	Negligible digital integration	Smart ticketing, crowd management, sustainability tracking	Global best practice: real-time data, digital fan experience, accessibility tools
Global positioning	Status dent from scandals	Stepping stone to India’s 2036 Olympic bid	Benchmark cities: London, Paris, Tokyo; novelty and inclusion

Sources: Indian Express on Ahmedabad’s governance approach; Firstpost and Times of India on Ahmedabad’s CWG vision; IOC and Paris 2024 sustainability resources.

Global standards: The Compass Ahmedabad Should Follow

Mega-events are innocuous, more reasonable, environmentally friendly, and more credible thanks to international standards. Additionally, they support host cities in striking a balance between responsibility and ambition.

Event Sustainability Management (ISO 20121:2024): An end-to-end sustainability management system that comprises of risk and impact assessment, stakeholder engagement, defined KPIs, transparent reporting. ISO 20121 was used in London 2012 and Paris 2024 to operationalize sustainability beyond catchphrases, including energy, materials, mobility, procurement, and inclusivity.
IOC-OECD guidelines for hosting major events: Power structures, risk registers, independent oversight, equitable procurement, and legacy measurement are all emphasized in these guidelines. They should be fused into Ahmedabad’s organizing charter, and compliance reports should be released on four times a year basis.
Paris 2024 practices and the IOC’s sustainability strategy: These days, reference point includes material reuse, low-carbon transportation, carbon planning, and venue optimization (giving importance to temporary buildings, modular construction, and existing venues). Ahmedabad can adopt Paris’s strategies of using renewable energy and district energy, minimalizing single-use materials, and prioritizing circular economy procurement.
UNESCO/UN social legacy frameworks: Measure social outcomes rather than just economic multipliers and match event investments with national development goals, such as accessibility, health, education, and participation. Ahmedabad should establish social KPIs early on, such as community programming hours per venue, women’s access, youth sports participation, and parasport inclusion.

Ahmedabad’s Opportunity Map: Assets, Gaps, and Choices

Ahmedabad has numerous advantages going into CWG 2030, including a solid track record of urban revitalization (Sabarmati Riverfront), improved movement via Metro and BRTS, and an established sports set-up led by the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Sports Enclave and Narendra Modi Stadium. The city must fit in these resources into an interconnected public value narrative in order to create a truly global event.

Venue tactics: Implement the “existing-first, temporary-second, new-only-if-essential” strategy. Give precedence to temporary overlays, modular expansions, and upgrades over long-term new construction. Co-locate with universities or community centres when new venues are required to guarantee year-round programming.
Mobility and accessibility: Create an accessible map for multilingual audiences; incorporate universal design for approachability; from ticketing to seating to transportation; integrate metro and BRTS service plans with event schedules; add last-mile bike and pedestrian corridors coupled to venues.

Energy and water: Design water reuse systems for pitches and aquatics; install real-time energy dashboards to overlook consumption and adjust during peak schedules; power venues with a blend of grid renewables, rooftop solar, and storage when practical; retrofit with LED and smart controls.
Waste and materials: Use circular procurement, which contains material passports for post-event recovery, reusable temporary structures, and recycled content. Contract food services with strict goals for food waste diversion and composting; mandate that suppliers disclose packaging strategies and end-of-life procedures.
Digital preparedness: Create an cohesive digital operations backbone with real-time control panel for waste, energy, transportation, crowd control, and safety. Provide companion apps and accessible digital ticketing with convenience features, real-time updates, and language support.
Community programming: Create a variety of pricing tiers, secure “minimum usage guarantees” with local federations, schools, and community organizations for post-Games access, and advance grant programs that support neighbourhood-based grassroots sports and are linked to venue schedules.

Governance and Finance: Credibility is a Choice, not a Circumstance

In governance, reliability will either be gained or lost. The public’s trust and the event’s repute are safeguarded by judicious spending and transparent decision-making.

Independent supervision: Establish a Board Audit and Risk Committee with external specialists in sustainability, construction, and procurement. Post updates on risk mitigation and risk registers. Hold monthly press conferences about milestones and budgets.
Open contracting: Use the Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) in all tenders; release assessment reports and award criteria; and reveal vendor conflicts of interest and advantageous ownership.
Value engineering and cost declaration: To keep budgets within envelopes, use target value design. Authenticate escalation rates and contingencies. Keep an open record of scope changes along with trade-offs and clarifications.
Legacy funding: To support community programming and venue maintenance, establish a legacy grant financed by sponsorships and post-event earnings. Introduce a “pay-to-play” model that strikes a sense of balance between protected community hours and corporate events.
Impact reporting: For ten years following the Games, a public legacy report covering participation, presence, health outcomes, environmental KPIs, and economic indicators shall be released every year.

Risk administration: Anticipate, Test, and Adapt

The fiasco of complex events is not due to the presence of risks, but rather to the absence of possession, practice, and communication of risks.

Scenario planning: Conduct full-scale simulations and tabletop exercises for transport strikes, extreme heat, monsoon disruptions, cyber incidents, and medical emergencies.
Supply chain resilience: Include provisions for ethical labor and safety compliance; diversify suppliers; pre-qualify substitutes; and maintain buffer stocks for essential materials.
Health and safety: Coordinate with hospitals and public health organizations; standardize emergency response procedures; guarantee venue medical coverage; instruct volunteers and employees on crowd safety and first aid.
Public communication: Establish trust by using multilingual channels, providing accessible alerts and alternatives during disruptions, and providing timely, transparent updates.

Conclusion: Build the Games the City Deserves

India learned from Delhi 2010 that a spectacle lacking of systems is fragile. Ahmedabad 2030 has the potential to make a different kind of promise: a Games that are meant for people, not just the podium. The city will host an event that feels sincere, judicious, and inclusive if it bases planning on transparent governance, legacy-first infrastructure, and credible sustainability. That is the true finish line, one that makes India’s case for the 2036 Olympics stronger and leaves a lifelong impact on communities rather than just financial statements.

[For queries or feedback, the Author can be reached out at architvyas10@gmail.com]

*DISCLAIMER- The opinions and views expressed in this article are that of the Author(s) and not of SLRI- the expressed opinions do not, in any way whatsoever, reflect the views of any third party, including any institution/organisation that the Author(s) is/are currently associated to or was/were associated to in the past. Furthermore, the expressions are solely for informational and educational purposes, and must not be deemed to constitute any kind of advice. The hyperlinks in this blog might take you to webpages operated by third parties- SLRI does not guarantee or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any information, data, opinions, advice, statements, etc. on these webpages.

PREFERRED CITATION: Archit Vyas, Ahmedabad CWG 2030 – Lessons from Delhi CWG 2010 and Global Standards for Mega Sporting Events, Sports Law Review India, published on 18 January 2026.

LET'S TALK SPORTS LAW